Synthetic Building Energy Consumption Dataset – Local Calendar Week Sampler (MODERATE Project)


Abstract

This dataset contains 50 synthetic years of sub-hourly building energy and indoor environment data, generated from approximately 3 years of real monitored data using the Local Calendar Week Sampler method developed within the MODERATE project (Horizon Europe GA 101069834). The synthetic generation approach recombines true historical weekly profiles into statistically plausible synthetic ones, preserving seasonal patterns, weekday/weekend variation, and distributional characteristics of the original data, while providing anonymization through resampling, donor diversification, and a percentile-based source-recognizability guardrail. Each synthetic year covers a full calendar year at 2-hour temporal resolution, with the following variables: Column Unit Description timestamp — Date and time (2h intervals) el. Energy kWh Electrical energy consumption th. Energy kWh Thermal energy consumption CO2 ppm Indoor CO₂ concentration Temperature °C Indoor air temperature WZ warm_water_energy kWh Domestic hot water energy ext. Solar Irradiance W/m² External solar irradiance ext. Temperature °C External air temperature synthetic_year_id — Identifier of the synthetic year (001–050) Generation Method The Local Calendar Week Sampler operates as follows: 1. Historical weeks are validated and flagged for gaps (>3h) or extreme values (>95th percentile). 2. For each target week, a candidate pool of temporally aligned historical weeks is assembled. 3. A primary donor (donor A) provides context variables (CO₂, temperature); a secondary daily donor (donor B) provides energy shape variation. 4. The synthetic profile is constructed as a scaled convex combination of donor profiles, anchored to a candidate-pool median baseline. 5. Weekly totals are rescaled to match a randomly selected week from the candidate pool. 6. A cosine transition layer is applied at week boundaries for temperature and CO₂ to avoid discontinuities. 7. Data is resampled to 2-hour resolution (energy summed, other variables averaged). Anonymization measures include donor energy contribution capping (10–35%), CO₂ anomaly screening, resampling, and a source-recognizability guardrail that resamples weeks where the original donor remains the closest shape match. Quality Metrics Statistical fidelity of the synthetic data relative to historical data was assessed using shape-based metrics across all 50 generated years: Metric Value Mean nearest weekly NRMSE 2.008 Median nearest weekly NRMSE 1.605 Weekly close-match rate (p01) 0.177 Weekly close-match rate (p05) 0.329 Source-is-nearest-weekly rate 0.095 Mean source shape correlation 0.487 Source-is-top-shape-match rate 0.201 Dominant candidate share 0.025 Normalized candidate usage entropy 0.982 The high candidate usage entropy (0.982) indicates well-distributed sampling with no dominant source weeks. The source-is-nearest rate of 9.5% is low, indicating effective anonymization. Approximately 40% of synthetic days have a historical near-duplicate below the empirical non-self NRMSE threshold — a known limitation without formal anonymization guarantees. Seasonal daily profiles and distributions of electrical energy, thermal energy, and domestic hot water energy were validated visually against historical data: Limitations No formal anonymization guarantees are provided. Thermal energy exhibits near-zero values in summer (near-heating-off conditions), which may amplify relative NRMSE in that season. The dataset does not include the original historical data. Related Resources MODERATE project: moderate-project.eu Grant Agreement No.: 101069834 MODERATE open-source tools: github.com/MODERATE-Project MODERATE platform: moderate.cloud

FAIR Overall Score

81%

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20177609

Citation

Barion, Antonio. (2026). Synthetic Building Energy Consumption Dataset – Local Calendar Week Sampler (MODERATE Project) [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20177609

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Contact for metadata

Eindhoven University of Technology


FAIR Overall Score: 81%

Evaluated by F-UJI - An Automated FAIR Data Assessment Tool: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6361400

Findable 57%
Accessible 100%
Interoperable 100%
Reusable 67%
Findable Moderate
Metadata and data are assigned a globally unique identifier.
FsF-F1-01MD · 1/1
  • Metadata identifier follows a defined unique identifier syntax or scheme (IRI, URL, UUID, HASH or PID) (1/1)
Metadata and data are assigned a persistent identifier.
FsF-F1-02MD · 0/1
  • Metadata identifier follows a defined persistent identifier syntax (0/0.5)
    • PID syntax is OK but the PID seems to resolve to a different entity, will not use this PID for content negotiation
    • Could not find any persistent identifier for metadata which is registered
  • Persistent identifier for metadata is registered and maintained by a PID authority (0/0.5)
    • Landing page domain resolved from PID found in metadata does not match with input URL domain -:eurac.edu <> zenodo.org
Metadata includes descriptive core elements (creator, title, data identifier, publisher, publication date, summary and keywords) to support data findability.
FsF-F2-01M · 0/2
  • Core data citation metadata is available (0/1)
    • Landing page domain resolved from PID found in metadata does not match with input URL domain -:eurac.edu <> zenodo.org
    • Failed to extract Datacite JSON -: 'bytes' object has no attribute 'get'
    • No response received from -: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20177609?format=metadata_datacite4, application/vnd.datacite.datacite+xml,application/xml, text/xml;q=0.5
  • Core descriptive metadata is available (0/1)
    • Failed to parse RDF, trying to fix RDF string and retry parsing everything before line -: 1
    • Request failed, status code -: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20177609?format=metadata_datacite4, application/vnd.datacite.datacite+xml,application/xml, text/xml;q=0.5 - 406
    • Not all required core descriptive metadata elements exist, missing -: ['publisher', 'creator']
Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes.
FsF-F3-01M · 1/1
  • Metadata contains a PID or URL which indicates the location of the downloadable data content (1/1)
Metadata is offered in such a way that it can be registered or indexed by search engines.
FsF-F4-01M · 2/2
  • Metadata is given in a way major search engines can ingest it for their catalogues (Dublin Core or schema.org or DCAT encoded in microdata, RDFa, embedded JSON-LD or meta tags see e.g. Google Dataset Search webmaster guidelines) (2/2)
Accessible Advanced
Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data.
FsF-A1-01M · 1/1
  • Information about access restrictions or rights can be identified in metadata (1/1)
Metadata and data are retrievable by their identifier
FsF-A1-02MD · 2/2
  • Metadata are retrievable via their specified identifier (1/1)
  • Data are retrievable via the identifiers given in metadata (1/1)
A standardized communication protocol is used to access metadata and data.
FsF-A1.1-01MD · 2/2
  • Identifier leading to metadata matches a scheme indicating a standardized web communication protocol. (1/1)
  • Identifier leading to data are matching a schema indicating a standardized web communication protocol. (1/1)
Metadata and data are accessible through a standardized communication protocol which supports authentication.
FsF-A1.2-01MD · 2/2
  • The communication protocol found in identifiers (IRIs) leading to metadata supports authentication. (1/1)
  • The communication protocol identified in data links (IRIs) supports authentication. (1/1)
Interoperable Advanced
Metadata is represented using a formal knowledge representation language.
FsF-I1-01M · 2/2
  • Parsable, structured metadata (JSON-LD, RDFa) is embedded in the landing page XHTML/HTML code (2/2)
  • Parsable, structured metadata (RDF, JSON-LD) is accessible through content negotiation, typed links or sparql endpoint (2/2)
Metadata uses registered semantic resources
FsF-I2-01M · 2/2
  • Metadata uses terms from registered vocabularies that are identified by their namespaces (2/2)
Metadata includes qualified references between the data and its related entities.
FsF-I3-01M · 2/2
  • Related resources are referenced in plain text within appropriate metadata properties indicating the relation type (2/2)
  • Related resources are referenced by machine readable links or identifiers within appropriate metadata properties indicating the relation type (2/2)
Reusable Moderate
Metadata specifies the content of the data.
FsF-R1-01M · 1/2
  • Minimum information (resource type) about the available data content is specified in the metadata (1/1)
  • Information on the manner and form (file size and type or service (API) endpoint and protocol) in which data is delivered is provided (0/1)
Metadata includes license information under which data can be reused.
FsF-R1.1-01M · 1/1
  • Licence information is given in an appropriate metadata element (1/1)
Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generation.
FsF-R1.2-01M · 1/1
  • Metadata contains elements which hold provenance information which can be mapped to PROV based on PROV-DC. (1/1)
  • Metadata contains elements which hold provenance information using formal provenance ontologies (PROV, PAV). (0/1)
Metadata follows a standard recommended by the target research community of the data.
FsF-R1.3-01M · 1/1
  • Community specific metadata standard is detected using namespaces or schemas found in provided metadata (1/1)
  • Multidisciplinary but community endorsed metadata (RDA Metadata Standards Catalog, fairsharing) standard is detected by namespace (1/1)
Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research community.
FsF-R1.3-02D · 0/1
  • Data is available in a file format recommended by the research community (long term file formats, open file formats or scientific file format) (0/1)

Assessed 2026-10-25 (metrics 0.8)


No docs sources are available.